In the world of valuation, clear and accurate communication is essential. Two concepts that often create confusion, especially among clients and newer appraisers, are extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions. While they may sound similar, they serve very different purposes in an appraisal report and can significantly affect how a value opinion is interpreted.
An extraordinary assumption is something the appraiser presumes to be true for the sake of the analysis, even though it may not be certain at the time of the appraisal. It is typically considered more common in its use and implies that while the assumption could be true, it hasn't yet been verified.
One example would be where a business is valued at a future date using forecasted data, which includes the assumption that significant investments will be made over the course of that future period. This assumption would be considered "extraordinary" because if it turns out to be false, it could significantly affect the value conclusion.
A hypothetical condition, on the other hand, assumes something that is known to be false as of a current or retrospective date but is taken as true for the purpose of the analysis.
This type of condition is essentially a "what-if" scenario. It is used when the appraiser is tasked with analyzing a situation that doesn't reflect the present reality of the business, such as a hypothetical change to the balance sheet or income statement, to show how the company may be more profitable under a restructured condition.
Both extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions are recognized under the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and must be clearly disclosed in the report.
Using them incorrectly can lead to misleading or non-credible appraisal results. More importantly, readers of the report, such as business owners, lenders, investors, or courts, need to understand whether the value opinion depends on something that is uncertain (extraordinary assumption) or flat-out not true (hypothetical condition).
Understanding the difference between these two concepts ensures the credibility, clarity, and compliance of an appraisal report. When used properly, extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions allow appraisers to address real-world complexities with professional rigor.